![]() ![]() The conclusions should always relate to the review elements of the paper Ĭ) In all cases, the discussion must be in the context of the relevant peer-reviewed literature, and as relevant, the grey literature. Primary data analyses (including data collection and data analysis) are beyond the scope of the journal. There are four main elements that we are looking for:Ī) The review should be authoritative, critical and add value to the literature ī) The paper should primarily be a review, although secondary data showing general trends can be used. The geographic spread of authors is extensive.Ī Review Paper “takes a comprehensive overview of a subject, bringing together the material and coming to some interesting conclusions”. Transport Reviews has authors from a range of backgrounds, including conventional academic authors, and those working in consultancies, local authorities, government departments and the international agencies. The reviews normally present new methodological approaches, new analysis, innovative perspectives and original data, but are not exclusively research based. modelling, qualitative approaches or mixed-methods). social issues or environment), and all methodological approaches (e.g. economics or engineering), all relevant subject areas (e.g. Transport Reviews encourages submissions from all disciplinary perspectives (e.g. It also provides a means by which experts from different backgrounds can find out about the subject area, so the papers should be accessible to a wide ranging readership. It provides authoritative and up to date research-based reviews of transport related topics that are informative to those that are knowledgeable in the subject area. Transport Reviews is an international review journal covering all aspects of transport. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |